Exploring attachment security in a sample of Lebanese adolescents: The validation of the Arabic IPPA-R.

Despite growing evidence supporting the importance of the quality of attachment during adolescence, no studies have been conducted to date in the Arab world due to an absence of valid and reliable tools to measure this construct in Arabic. The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment-Revised (IPPA-R) was devised as a self-report questionnaire in English to assess the quality of adolescent attachment to mother, father, and peers, each scale consisting of 25 items. The current study sets out to determine the psychometric properties of the Arabic IPPA-R and to explore attachment styles in Lebanon in a sample of 765 Lebanese adolescents. Results suggested a modified three-factor structure to reach satisfactory reliability of the Arabic IPPA-R, resulting in a modified questionnaire consisting of 19 items for each of mother (α = .82) and father (α = .85), and 21 items for peers (α = .89). Strict measurement invariance across gender was achieved for the IPPA-R parental forms, while only scalar invariance was achieved for the IPPA-R peers form. Overall, there were significant differences in attachment scores to mother and father, with adolescents scoring higher on attachment to mother, with both scores being significantly lower than attachment to peers. Gender differences were found on the peer scale with girls scoring significantly higher than boys. Results are interpreted from a cultural lens, emphasizing the importance of accounting for cultural, religious, and socio-economic factors in understanding adolescent attachment. This study is the first conducted in the Arab region and provides a road map to understanding gender-roles, parental expectations and adolescent perceived parenting, and their impact on adolescent attachment scores.

Predictors of Mental Health Literacy in a Sample of Health Care Major Students: Pilot Evaluation Study.

BACKGROUND: The numerous mental health awareness campaigns during the COVID-19 pandemic have shifted our understanding and perception of mental health. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate predictors of mental health literacy (MHL), that is, one's knowledge and beliefs about mental disorders. We evaluate whether digital health literacy, empathy, and mentalizing contribute to MHL. METHODS: Our sample consisted of 89 health care major students, aged between 17 and 32 years, studying at a university in Lebanon. The Mental Health Literacy Scale for Healthcare Students (MHLS-HS), the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ), the Basic Empathy Scale (BES), and the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire-8 (RFQ-8) were used. RESULTS: Multiple regression analyses revealed that the Engagement in Own Health subscale of digital health literacy constituted a predictor of MHL. While empathy and mentalizing did not directly predict MHL, they were found to predict components of MHL. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate digital health literacy, empathy, and mentalizing as predictors of MHL in Lebanon, a country where mental health is still considered taboo. Moreover, this pilot study is the first to provide some support for the predictive role of some digital health literacy subscales on MHL in light of the rise of the digital era following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Psychometric validation of the Arabic multiple sclerosis resiliency scale: Uncovering resilience factors in Lebanese MS patients for clinical and research advancements.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease that involves the central nervous system (CNS). Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) may experience difficulty adapting to their diagnosis as the unpredictable nature of the disease can be challenging to cope with. Methods: The purpose of this study is twofold. First, we have culturally adapted and analyzed the Arabic version of the Multiple Sclerosis Resiliency Scale (MSRS) psychometric properties. Second, we aimed to explore resilience in a sample of Lebanese patients with MS in the face of the chronic disease and financial hardship that Lebanon is going through to evaluate their strengths and struggles. The sample consisted of 306 participants aged between 18 and 79 diagnosed with MS for at least one year. Results: After examining criterion validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability, the Arabic version of the MSRS exhibited good psychometric properties. The study also revealed that resilience increases with age and lower disability scores. Additionally, individuals with higher resilience levels displayed lower levels of depression. The research revealed that MS patients have high resilience, mainly relying on cognitive and emotional strategies, social support from family and friends, MS peer support, and spirituality. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of emotional coping strategies and social support in building resilience among MS patients.

Teleconsultation Platforms Versus WhatsApp Consultations: Evaluating Patients and Physicians' Attitudes.

Background: Since the 1990s, society has witnessed a surge in information and communication technologies that extended to the health care system. Teleconsultation platforms have become widely established tools that provide an opportunity for emerging countries such as Lebanon to expand and advance health care services. However, their use in Lebanon remains limited considering many people's preference to resort to nonmedical platforms such as WhatsApp for consultations. Methods: The purpose of this mixed-method study is to evaluate patients' and physicians' attitudes toward teleconsultation platforms versus WhatsApp consultations in Lebanon. In the quantitative component, 1,467 patients were administered a self-developed questionnaire, while in the qualitative component, a semistructured interview was conducted with 14 physicians practicing in Lebanon. Results: Results revealed that teleconsultation platforms and WhatsApp are not interchangeable. Patients' and physicians' experiences, perceptions, and satisfaction with teleconsultation platforms and WhatsApp are discussed. Conclusions: Individual and governmental recommendations for safer, more controlled, and more ethical online consultation practices are provided for both physicians and patients, through both modalities.